On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 14:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > This is discouraging; it certainly doesn't make me want to expend the > effort to develop a production patch.
Perhaps. Why do this only for shared memory? Surely the majority of memory accesses are to private memory, so being able to allocate private memory in a single huge page would be better for avoiding TLB cache misses. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
