Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> Umm, nobody has attributed ridiculousness to anyone. Please don't put
> words in my mouth. But I think this is a perfectly reasonable discussion
> to have. Nobody gets to come along and get the features they want
> without some sort of consensus, not me, not you, not Joachim, not Tom.
In particular, this issue *has* been discussed before, and there was a
consensus that preserving dump consistency was a requirement. I don't
think that Joachim gets to bypass that decision just by submitting a
patch that ignores it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
