Excerpts from Heikki Linnakangas's message of vie dic 03 16:45:59 -0300 2010:
> ALTER TABLE table_name SET PRIMARY KEY USING INDEX index_name. Quite > verbose, but imho USING makes it much more clear that it's an existing > index. I was going to post the same thing (well except I was still thinking in ADD PRIMARY KEY rather than SET PRIMARY KEY). I think SET is better than ADD in that it is a bit different from the syntax that makes it create a new index. On the other hand, it could also be pointlessly annoying. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
