On 12/6/10 6:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> Actually, on OSX 10.5.8, o_dsync and fdatasync aren't even available. >>> From my run, it looks like even so regular fsync might be better than >>> open_sync. > >> But I think you need to use fsync_writethrough if you actually want >> durability. > > Yeah. Unless your laptop contains an SSD, those numbers are garbage on > their face. So that's another problem with test_fsync: it omits > fsync_writethrough.
Yeah, the issue with test_fsync appears to be that it's designed to work without os-specific switches no matter what, not to accurately reflect how we access wal. I'll see if I can do better. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers