"Kevin Grittner" <[email protected]> writes:
> Oh, I just went through the code on setting READ ONLY and discovered
> that contrary to the standard *and* the PostgreSQL documentation,
> you can change the status of a transaction between READ ONLY and
> READ WRITE at will. Yeah, that's a problem for my intended use.
> Many optimizations would need to go right out the window, and the
> false positive rate under SSI would be high.
I believe you had better support the locution
begin;
set transaction read only;
...
I agree that letting it be changed back to read/write after that is
surprising and unnecessary. Perhaps locking down the setting at the
time of first grabbing a snapshot would be appropriate. IIRC that's
how it works for transaction isolation level, and this seems like it
ought to work the same.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
