On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:22 PM, aaliya zarrin <aaliya.zar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is this provision already there in the code? > There ate already SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 are handled in the postmaster? is it > for the same?
SIGUSR1 is already used. SIGUSR2 is actually unused, but reserved for children according to the source code comment. Though I've been thinking about this topic, a good idea doesn't occur to me yet. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg00929.php Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
