On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 19:54, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 12/12/2010 01:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> (Hm, I wonder whether BCC defines them either...) > >> Is anyone building the client stuff with BCC any more? I don't recall >> having heard of anyone doing so for quite some years. > > It's a fair question. We could clean up some of these messy ifdefs > if we dropped support for that combination. I assume that an MSVC-built > libpq.dll would still work for Borland users, no?
The dynamic one, yes. Static linked one, no. IIRC I suggest desupporting it every now and then and get voted down ;) And quite often we have someone showing up around the x.y.2 release to clean it up so it works again... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
