Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 16:52, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If we used PID then we'd eventually have 64K (or whatever the range of
>> PIDs is on your platform) different pg_temp_nnn entries cluttering
>> pg_namespace.
> Should they not be cleaned up at backend exit even when they are in
> range 1..MaxBackends ?
Hm. We currently remove the schema contents (ie the temp tables) but
not the pg_namespace entry itself. Seems like deleting that only to
have to recreate it would be a waste of cycles.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
