On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 16:48, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 17:13, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> writes:
>>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 17:07, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> because if you're trying to link against an older libpq, the link will
>>>> fail before you ever get to execute.  So let's have a less implausible
>>>> use-case please.
>>
>>> Look back at the very start of the thread.
>>
>> OK, but let's document those examples instead.
>
> Something like this better?

I got some help from Bruce to look over the grammar in the docs (and
fix the broken ones), and have now applied and pushed this.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to