On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 16:48, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 17:13, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 17:07, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> because if you're trying to link against an older libpq, the link will >>>> fail before you ever get to execute. So let's have a less implausible >>>> use-case please. >> >>> Look back at the very start of the thread. >> >> OK, but let's document those examples instead. > > Something like this better?
I got some help from Bruce to look over the grammar in the docs (and fix the broken ones), and have now applied and pushed this. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
