Marko Tiikkaja <[email protected]> writes:
> On 2010-12-22 8:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Is this the patch of record? There are no changes to the documentation
>> included.
> I've kept the documentation as a separate patch, but I haven't touched
> it in a very long time. I will work on the documentation if there's a
> chance of the patch getting accepted for 9.1. This arrangement makes
> more sense to me and I'm sure others will agree.
Well, it's difficult to review a documentation-free patch.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers