On mån, 2010-12-27 at 12:33 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > On a more general point, it would be useful to have some > infrastructure for running quality checks like this and publishing the > results. We should be way beyond the point where we rely on > individuals doing this sort of stuff.
I had a Hudson service set up for things like this, but the hosting was unreliable and then the thing faded away. I could try to revive it. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
