Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This small patch reloads dynamic libraries whose modification time is
> greater than that at the time it was initially loaded. This means that
> connections do not need to be reinitialised when a library is recompiled.
Is that a good idea? It's easy to imagine cases where a library is not
designed to be unloaded (eg, it hooks into things in the main backend
and doesn't have a way to unhook). I'd rather stick with the current
behavior of unload/reload only when specifically commanded to.
The patch as given fails in the same inode/different path case, btw.
I think you wanted to make the test further down.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
