Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Dec 28, 2010 3:58 PM, "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> What's the use case? And aren't there security reasons to NOT expose
>> that? It might contain a password for instance.
> Good point - should be made superuser only.
I'm still wondering what's the actual use-case for exposing this inside
SQL. Those with a legitimate need-to-know can look at the slave
server's config files, no?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
