Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 16:15, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Also, if you really do need to figure out which PG headers you're
>> compiling against, looking at catversion.h is the accepted way to do it.
>> There's no need for yet another symbol.
> This file is, AFAIK, not included with client installs? It's
> definitely not present in the libpq-dev package on debian. It's a
> backend development file, no?
[ shrug... ] We can't be held responsible for stupid packaging
decisions by distros.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
