On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 16:27 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > I think it's a bad idea to use the same parameter to mean different > things on the master and standby.
Obviously if you phrase it like that, nobody would disagree. I would say I have used the same parameter on both sides in a balanced way to simplify the configuration, which had been an important factor in the debate. "You need to set parameter X on both primary and standby" seems simple and clear. It certainly works OK for MySQL. It's no bother to change, whichever way we decide and I'm happy to do so. My previous patch had two parameters: primary: synchronous_replication = ... standby: synchronous_replication_service = on | off Which do people prefer? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
