> Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> writes: >> Comments are welcome. > > This is a bad idea. It makes an already-poorly-tested code path > significantly more fragile, in return for nothing of value.
Are you saying that procsignal.c is the already-poorly-tested one? If so, why? As for "value", I have already explained why we need this in the upthread. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
