On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 19:08, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: >>> I'm not going to maintain more than one buildfarm member doing MSVC, and and >>> if we were to adopt your policy I would not be able to use a modern-ish >>> version of the compiler/SDK and also build all the live branches. > >> Well, it's perfectly possible to have more tha none version of MSVC on >> the machine. > >> And we're not going to be changing the version that's actually used >> for the official binary builds, so all you'll accomplish then is to >> have the buildfarm test something different form what we're shipping. > > Are you speaking for EDB on that?
He's not speaking *for* us, but he's absolutely right. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
