On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:24:19AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > I still think you're better off focusing first on the case where we > can skip the whole nine yards, and doing this stuff as a follow-on > patch. Trying to do too many things, especially possibly > controversial stuff, especially in the last CommitFest, often ends up > with the whole patch getting rejected, which makes no one happy. > Submitting the smallest useful, self-contained change you can and then > work up from there. Or at least split out the patch into parts that > can be applied independently, so that if the eventual committer likes > A but not B you at least get A in.
Will do. Thanks. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
