On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:10:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > hstore's "hstore ?& text[]" operator is defined as "contains all", ie, > it will return true if all the key names found in the text array are > present in the hstore. > > ISTM that a sane definition of this operator would provide that if the > array is empty, it returns true: every set contains the empty set. > However, the code goes out of its way to return false instead. > > Perhaps this was done intentionally because there was no way to make > GIN index searches work compatibly ... but now there is, so I see no > reason to remain bug-compatible with this behavior. > > Barring objections, I'm going to fix it.
+1 for fixing it. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[email protected]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [email protected] iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
