> There was never any intention that that code produce a guaranteed-unique > identifier; it's only meant to be a humanly useful identifer, and this > patch seems to me to mostly add noise.
Would making the identifier unique do any *harm*?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
