Excerpts from Maciej Sakrejda's message of mar ene 11 03:28:13 -0300 2011:
> Tried asking this in pgsql-general but I got no response, so I thought
> I'd give hackers a shot:
>
> postgres=# select (((1.7976931348623157081e+308)::double
> precision)::text)::double precision;
> ERROR: "1.79769313486232e+308" is out of range for type double precision
>
> I'm working on a pg driver and in my float data decoder functional
> tests, I ran into some errors that I eventually traced back to this
> behavior. Essentially, postgres seems to cast the max normal double
> (i.e., the bits of ~(1ULL<<52 | 1ULL<<63)) to text in such a manner
> that it's rounded up, and the reverse cast, text-to-double-precision,
> does not recognize it as being in range. Curiously, pg_dump seems to
> print doubles with more precision (in both COPY and INSERT modes),
> avoiding this issue.
Yeah, it sets the extra_float_digits parameter.
alvherre=# set extra_float_digits to 3;
SET
alvherre=# select (((1.7976931348623157081e+308)::double
precision)::text)::double precision;
float8
──────────────────────────
1.79769313486231571e+308
(1 fila)
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
