On tis, 2011-01-11 at 16:57 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > Making it work for language SQL would be nice, though. > > Please consider a new DEPENDENCY_XXX constant for that though, because > otherwise I think it could cause problems in the extension's dependency > tracking. Even with a new DEPENDENCY_FUNCALL or other constant, the > extension code would need to be aware of this new kind of not-to-follow > dependencies somehow, I guess.
What's a "not-to-follow dependency"? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
