On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > I've committed the backend side of this, without that. Still working > on the client, and on cleaning up Heikki's patch for grammar/parser > support.
Great work! I have some comments: While walsender is sending a base backup, WalSndWakeup should not send the signal to that walsender? In sendFile or elsewhere, we should periodically check whether postmaster is alive and whether the flag was set by the signal? At the end of the backup by walsender, it forces a switch to a new WAL file and waits until the last WAL file has been archived. So we should change postmaster so that it doesn't cause the archiver to end before walsender ends when shutdown is requested? Also, when shutdown is requested, the walsender which is streaming WAL should not end before another walsender which is sending a backup ends, to stream the backup-end WAL? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
