On Thursday 09 May 2002 07:51 am, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 8 May 2002, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > 3) If (2) is the case, then development could continue under the BSD > > > license, since developers could use the BSD-original code for their > > > development work. So there is no risk of "backflow polution".
> > Can PostgreSQL, Inc be the GPL distributor for these purposes, being a > > separate entity from the PostgreSQL Global Development Group? > Ummmm ... no? We tend to be anti-GPL over here, since its anti-business > ... gborg would be a good place for any of this ... I can see my feeble attempt at humor fell flat. Sorry. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
