Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> +1, I like the idea. Would it still be there to override if necessary?
> Depends what people want to do. We could make the default "0kB", and > define that to mean "auto-tune", or we could remove the parameter > altogether. I think I was envisioning the latter, but if people are > hesitant to do that we could do the former instead. I think we need to keep the override capability until the autotune algorithm has proven itself in the field for a couple of years. I agree with Josh that a negative value should be used to select the autotune method. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers