On Jan 13, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Something else that might be of interest: the patch as presented here > does NOT solve the deadlock problem originally presented by Joel > Jacobson. It does solve the second, simpler example I presented in my > blog article referenced above, however. I need to have a closer look at > that problem to figure out if we could fix the deadlock too.
Sounds like a big win already. Should this be considered a WIP patch, though, if you still plan to look at Joel's deadlock example? Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
