Le 14 janv. 2011 à 20:08, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> So it looks to me like there are at least two fixes other than the ones >> you enumerated: >> >> 1. Make NOWAIT a reserved word. Not good, but perhaps better than >> reserving all the different object type names. >> >> 2. Disallow the above abbreviated syntax; allow NOWAIT only after an >> explicit IN ... MODE phrase. This would probably break a couple of >> applications, but I bet a lot fewer than changing the longer-established >> parts of the command syntax would break. >> >> I think #2 might be the best choice here. +1 > > That strikes me as pretty unintuitive. I'd rather take the hit of > forcing people to write "LOCK TABLE foo" instead of just "LOCK foo" > than try to explain why they have to include "IN ACCESS EXCLUSIVE > MODE" if they want to stick "NOWAIT" on the end. However, I guess > it's a matter of opinion so... anyone else have an opinion? Since you ask, see above. :) -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
