Tom Lane wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <[email protected]> writes: > > Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The reason for wanting to deprecate and ultimately remove that > >> syntax is so we can get rid of FREEZE as a reserved word. > > > Oh, OK. I can go along with that. If we're going that route, > > though, shouldn't we be getting support for the new syntax added, so > > there can be a release or two supporting both? > > You mean like 9.0?
FYI, I just checked and pg_upgrade does not run the VACUUM command at all, but vacuumdb, and vacuumdb knows to use parentheses when connecting to a >= 9.0 server. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
