Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
> > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> The reason for wanting to deprecate and ultimately remove that
> >> syntax is so we can get rid of FREEZE as a reserved word.
> 
> > Oh, OK.  I can go along with that.  If we're going that route,
> > though, shouldn't we be getting support for the new syntax added, so
> > there can be a release or two supporting both?
> 
> You mean like 9.0?

FYI, I just checked and pg_upgrade does not run the VACUUM command at
all, but vacuumdb, and vacuumdb knows to use parentheses when connecting
to a >= 9.0 server.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to