On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 17:46, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> Before I go ahead and commit the part that adds >> log_replication_connections, anybody else want to object to the idea? > > I think it'd make more sense just to say that replication connections > are subject to the same log_connections rule as others. An extra GUC > for this is surely overkill.
I thought so, but Robert didn't agree. And given that things are the way they are, clearly somebody else didn't agree as well - though I've been unable to locate the original discussion if there was one. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
