On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 19:34 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote: > I agree it's pretty late in the cycle, but I'm going through all the > loose ends and found this one -- which has been hanging out on the > Wiki page as an R&D item for over a full year without discussion. > :-( If we provide the snapshots (which we can safely and easily > do), can someone else who knows what they're doing with WAL and HS > get the rest of it safely into the release? That seems to me to be > the only way it can still happen for 9.1.
I gave you a quick response to let you know that HS need not be a blocker, for this release. If you are saying you have knowingly ignored a requirement for a whole year, then I am shocked. How exactly did you think this would ever be committed? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers