Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 17:36, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > > > > > On 01/27/2011 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> > >> Given that nobody is supposed to push temporary branches to the master > >> repo anyway, an intended branch removal should be a pretty darn rare > >> event. ?Now, our committers all seem to be pretty careful people, so > >> I don't feel strongly about having extra security on this --- but if > >> it's easy to do, it's probably a good idea. > >> > > > > Pushing a local topic branch by mistake seems much more likely to me. Some > > protection against that mightn't be a bad idea. Maybe for example a check on > > the branch name? > > Or for that we could just disable branch creation *completely*, and > then turn off that restriction that one time / year that we actually > create a branch?
Well, branch creation can always be undone --- branch removal seems like the big problem because it can't. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
