Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes: > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 09:17 -0800, David Fetter wrote: >> For consistency, and in order not to continue our atrocious naming >> tradition, I'd like to propose that the above be named timestamprange >> (tsrange for short) and timestamptzrange (tstzrange for short).
> No real objection, but I'd like to see if someone else will second it. > Also, I don't think aliases are very easy to define. They are not, and should be avoided. I don't think we have *any* typename aliases except for cases required by SQL standard. >> Should there also be a timerange and a timetzrange? > I thought about it, and I realized that I've never seen the "time" type > used. Again, I'll add it if someone will use it. I have no idea what the semantics of timetzrange would be. Even timerange would be a bit funny --- is 11PM before or after 1AM? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers