On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 16:22, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 16:21, Christian Ullrich <ch...@chrullrich.net> wrote:
>> * Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>>> However, i think the code path down around the error message is simply
>>> incorrect. That #ifdef spaghetti is pretty hard to parse, but it gives
>>> the wrong error message (we should say it's sspi that's not available
>>> when we have none of the two options) and/or a "duplicate case label"
>>> error, in some combinations of sspi/gssapi existing/notexisting.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Attached is an updated version of the patch that passes compiling on
>>> all my systems in different combinations, including msvc. Can you
>>> verify that it still works in your env? (you don't have to retest all
>>> those platforms!)
>>
>> Yes, it works fine, for md5, sspi, and gss authentication methods, tested
>> with MIT 1.4 against Windows 2008R2, PostgreSQL 8.4.4.
>
> Great, thanks!

And applied.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to