=?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= <wulc...@wulczer.org> writes: > OK, now it works flawlessly as far as I can tell. Will mark it as Ready > for Committer.
Applied with mostly-stylistic corrections, plus addition of documentation and a minimal regression test. I did *not* apply this bit: >> 2) I found gist index not very useful with default SIGLENINT = 3. I've >> changed this value to 15 and I found gist index performs very good on >> dictionary. But on longer strings greater values of SIGLENINT may be >> required (probably even SIGLENINT > 122 will give benefit in some cases in >> spite of TOAST). AFAICT that would break on-disk compatibility of pg_trgm GIST indexes. I don't believe we have adequate evidence to justify doing that, and in any case it ought to be a separate patch rather than buried inside a mostly unrelated feature patch. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers