On 02/02/2011 11:45 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
But why are we bothering to keep $prolog at
all any more, if all we're going to pass it is&PL_sv_no all the
time? Maybe we'll have a use for it in the future, but right now we
don't appear to unless I'm missing something.
PostgreSQL::PLPerl::NYTProf would break if it was removed, so I'd rather
it wasn't.
I could work around that if there's an easy way for perl code to tell
what version of PostgreSQL. If there isn't I think it would be worth
adding.
Not really. It might well be good to add but that needs to wait for
another time. I gather you're plugging in a replacement for mkfunc?
For now I'll add a comment to the code saying why it's there.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
