Em 08-02-2011 11:05, Simon Riggs escreveu:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 21:15 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:

+       else if (recoveryTarget == RECOVERY_TARGET_NAME)
+               snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer),
+                                "%s%u\t%s\t%s named restore point %
+                                (srcfd<  0) ? "" : "\n",
+                                parentTLI,
+                                xlogfname,
+                                recoveryStopAfter ? "after" :
+                                recoveryStopNamedRestorePoint);

It doesn't matter if it is after or before the restore point.
only make sense when we're dealing with transaction or time.

you're right

Not sure I understand the comment "only make sense when we're dealing
with transaction or time."  Why?

Because named restore point is a noop xlog record; besides, transaction and time involves xlog records that contain data.

  Euler Taveira de Oliveira

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to