Andrew, * Andrew Dunstan (and...@dunslane.net) wrote: > See the discussion back around the the 8.1 release (IIRC) when we > added the HEADER option.
I recall seeing it and not agreeing with it then. :)
> >If I wanted something to throw away the first record of a file before
> >loading it, I'd use tail.
>
> The whole point of us having direct CSV import is to minimise the
> requirement for preprocessing.
Having a 'throw away 1 line' option is just silly to me, but documenting
it as "header" is worse. Water under the bridge at this point though.
> That said, I think there's probably a good case for an option to use
> the header line as a column list. I know of at least one application
> I have written that could benefit from it. But that's work for 9.2
> or later.
I agree it's work for 9.2. I could probably help with this if people
agree that it should be done.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
