On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 01:27, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > However, file_fdw is in pretty serious trouble because (1) the copy > API patch that it depends on still isn't committed and (2) it's going > to be utterly broken if we don't do something about the > client_encoding vs. file_encoding problem; there was a patch to do > that in this CF, but we gave up on it.
Will we include the copy API patch in 9.1 even if we won't have file_fdw? Personally, I want to include the APIs because someone can develop file_fdw as a third party extension for 9.1 using the infrastructure. The extension will lack of file encoding support, but still useful for many cases. -- Itagaki Takahiro -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
