On Feb 15, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> Yeah, that bug is fixed with the attached, though I am rethinking this >> bit. > > I am thinking that the statute of limitations has expired on this > patch, and that we should mark it Returned with Feedback and continue > working on it for 9.2. I know it's a valuable feature, but I think > we're out of time.
How is such a determination made, exactly? Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
