On Feb 14, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote:

>> IMO, sooner or later we need to trash that code and replace it with
>> something a bit more modification-friendly.
> 
> We thought about configurable parser, but AFAIR, we didn't get any support 
> for this at that time.

What would it take to change the requirement such that *any* SQL function could 
be a parser, not only C functions? Maybe require that they turn a nested array 
of tokens? That way I could just write a function in PL/Perl quite easily.

Best,

David


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to