On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Daniel Farina <dan...@heroku.com> wrote: > I'm taking a look at replication timeout with non-blocking which would > be "nice" but not required for this patch, in my understanding.
Why do you think so? You think sync_replication_timeout_client is sufficient for sync rep? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
