=?utf-8?q?Rados=C5=82aw_Smogura?= <rsmog...@softperience.eu> writes: > Here is extended version, has version field (N_ACL_RIGHTS*2) and reserved > mask, as well definition is more general then def of PGSQL. In any way it > require that rights mades bit array.
You're going in quite the wrong direction here. The consensus as I understood it was that we should just use the text representation in binary mode too, rather than inventing a separate representation that's going to put a whole new set of constraints on what can happen to the internal representation. The proposal you have here has no redeeming social value whatever, because nobody cares about the I/O efficiency for aclitem (and even if anyone did, you've made no case that this would actually be more efficient to use on the client side). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers