=?utf-8?q?Rados=C5=82aw_Smogura?= <rsmog...@softperience.eu> writes:
> Here is extended version, has version field (N_ACL_RIGHTS*2) and reserved 
> mask, as well definition is more general then def of PGSQL. In any way it 
> require that rights mades bit array.

You're going in quite the wrong direction here.  The consensus as I
understood it was that we should just use the text representation in
binary mode too, rather than inventing a separate representation that's
going to put a whole new set of constraints on what can happen to the
internal representation.  The proposal you have here has no redeeming
social value whatever, because nobody cares about the I/O efficiency
for aclitem (and even if anyone did, you've made no case that this would
actually be more efficient to use on the client side).

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to