> there could be only one standby at the same time... > in the original patch there could be several synchronous standby > servers and the primary was going to wait until the first one of them > to answer, but that was removed and replaced by a list of possible > synch standby servers and the first that connects is the one the > primary will wait for. because right now it's a simple list the first > one will always be the synch standby until it's removed from the list > or phisically. > > the other comment in the doc should be removed
Thanks for the info! -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
