Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> PL/pgSQL trigger functions currently require a value to be returned,
> even though that value is not used for anything in case of a trigger
> fired AFTER. I was wondering if we could relax that.
I got bit by that just a couple days ago --- I supposed that a trigger
that wasn't returning anything useful shouldn't need an explicit
RETURN. So +1 for doing something about it. However, unless it's a
very small and simple patch, I concur with Robert that it might be
a bit late to consider this for 9.1.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
