David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> writes: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:44:06AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> I think it's good to include the table name, for sure. I *think* I >> agree that it isn't necessary to include the child names.
> Would this affect the use case of breaking up a too-long table into > partitions? > WITH f AS ( > DELETE FROM ONLY foo > WHERE foo_ts >= '2011-01-01' AND foo_ts < '2011-02-01' > RETURNING * > ) > INSERT INTO foo_201101 > SELECT * FROM f; In that example, each ModifyTable node is constrained to a single target table, so I'm not sure what your point is. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers