On Mar 2, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > "David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes: >> If my extension requires a procedural language, will adding that language to >> the `requires` control key do what I think it should do? > > No. > > Probably in future the standard PLs will be packaged as extensions, and > then it will work. The main reason that it won't happen for 9.1 is that > right now we require superuser privilege to install an extension, which > would be a regression compared to the privilege requirements for > installing standard PLs in existing releases. And relaxing that > requirement is a research project :-(
Okay. I guess the to do list should be updated? http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
