On Mar 3, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> Which is why my suggestion is pretty much free from any design > > Now you're scaring me. I read that as "the proposed design is free > from the influence of any design effort."
No. Just as simple as possible. > That's precisely how you > can find yourself standing in a corner with wet paint on the floor > all around you. But if the paint were made with chocolate, would you care? > At a minimum you would need to specify the format of the dependency > list and either some header and or terminator or some specification > of something which *can't* be in the list. It would be ironic if > our extensions configuration wasn't extensible. I'm talking about a hard-coded list of things that can go on the list, core items, simply separated by commas (or however the postgresql.conf format supports a list of items). No external dependencies (like the particular version of libxml2) or any version numbers at all, aside from the server itself. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
