Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> requires_superuser isn't bad, but I think I'd rather avoid "requires"
>> here since we're also using that terminology for prerequisite
>> extensions. How about "must_be_superuser"?
> Sorry to continue painting in old fashioned colors, but if we're not
> going to reuse established terms from our âglossaryâ, then I'd better
> see us using just "superuser" here.
[ shrug... ] No objection here. Going once, going twice ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
