On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 22:56 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 12:42 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > That response is just dodging the hard question, so whatever. Tom's > > > cleanup is not going to break things, or at least it's going to fix > > > more than it breaks on net. Sync rep, on the other hand, is going to > > > do the opposite, probably by a large margin. > > > > Well, we need to at least give Simon and Fujii a chance to respond > > during their respective daytime hours. > > Friday is a reasonable deadline.
I'm not going to be committing Sync Rep today. It's technically in very good shape, but some of the conceptual issues aren't clear enough on a Friday night to make it sensible for me to commit to PostgreSQL, given we must support it for 5 years if I do. I believe those things are resolvable for 9.1, probably fairly soon, but I'm not going to rush a commit just to hit a deadline. That isn't the Way of Quality that we have followed for so long. I'll let y'all discuss what to do next. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers