Excerpts from Greg Stark's message of jue mar 03 13:02:53 -0300 2011: > But I'm not sure it's worth bothering. Filling in the description > field is hardly the most annoying part of adding pg_proc entries for > operators. If we could move most or all of the entries to an SQL file > so that we didn't have to deal with commutator and negator oids and > all that, that would save a lot of pain.
You seem to want to have a completely new way to describe contents of pg_proc.h and pg_operator.h, from which the DATA and DESCR lines could be generated. Perhaps that's a worthy goal, not sure. I'm not sure it can be done with SQL though. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
